Is Google's pregnant cow most promise than Nasa's ?

 Is Google's_pregnant_cow most promising than Nasa's ?

No.

Because Nasa in front to 1 Google's pregnant cow presents and owns (in part at least) the Nasa's_Moon_cow, the Nasa's_Mars_cow, the Nasa's_Jupiter_cow, the Nasa's_Sun_cow... well.

But yes, under the no.

Because Google's pregnant cow is giving birth to a lot of useful things for the folks needs.

Then Google is linking people versus every day more essentials utilities and the generation of potencial promises is guaranted with folks working to generated  enought capital to achieve.

People generate enought capital not only for Google baby_things. People generate enought capital for Governments needs and for Nasa's baby_things.

Yes, but to Google nobody pays the straw. And the correct answer for title question have to include cost and straw for cow. Please call #quadrillions business makers = Google/USAdmin.

It means that in our Classic Economy the financial sources are drained. And people has no capital reserves on savings or others classic assets to support Government needs or even the bond and derivatives markets needs. In Classical economics we are already almost accustomed to the false, after so many false supposed solutions.

That's why, the investment's substitute (#datevaluation) in the belly of the Google's pregnant cow, take it's real dimension.

Lauching the Economy 4G3W, giving folks a one-click-motor-for-savings, people solve their needs and wants and attend Government's or Nasa's on financial capital needs.Because it's time to deal time.

Have you think about the real potential of #webcashmatic infinite results in #webtaxmatic freedom ?

Facts we know