Yes and no. No because hope is an intangible thing. Yes because hope makes men walk.
That's also why, datevaluation solves 1 of the hardest problems for the people.
As Google X resolves so many.
Our thing, datevaluation practice, seems unable to change the course of economics. Yes because, at what serves an investment substitute, what is it utility ?
Datevaluation is coming to conciliate the setback ; if I spend, I don't save neither invest ; if I save, I don't invest neither I spend ; if I invest, I don't spend neither I save. In fact, the Classic Economy is limited at 3 contradictory gestures over the money. And the economic results are limited in reason of this classical limits.
Google X understand how to enlarge more utilities. Giving folks solutions. Seeking new how to improve the lives of millions, even billions, of people. For that, trillions, even quadrillions, of dollars are the predictible invoice for some possible constructions. Google X, yes. Alphabet a little less. And Google, no. Because results have to grow in same proportion and money mountains are hard to scale.
Then datevaluation, at half build and appropriated for speedly launch, is the practice to provide money to the people.
And if the utility of Google Search gaves more than one trillion dollars in results, imagine the utility of provinding money for resolving folks needs and wants and you see where is going "datevaluation" results for the subjects of tech agreements and for others at political regulations.
